Osborn, LLC has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Indiana, the first in 2015.
OSHA's last visit started on Feb 5, 2026 on a referral, in Richmond, and the case has not closed yet.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 3 citation items: 3 serious.
OSHA proposed $17,100 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $12,645, down 26%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.212, machine guarding (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Osborn, LLC averages $4,215 over 3 cited inspections in that time.
Osborn, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Osborn, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company3031 W. Industries, Richmond, IN 47374 · Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $6,300 | $6,300 | Apr 16, 2026 | Open |
3031 W. Industries, Richmond, IN 47374 · All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i) · Mechanical power presses |
Serious | $6,300 | $4,095 | Oct 14, 2025 | Final |
2350 Salisbury Road North, Richmond, IN 47374 · Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $4,500 | $2,250 | Oct 15, 2015 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Richmond site logged 4 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 171 workers: 2.4 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.7 for its industry. Those cases cost 4 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osborn Richmond · 2025 | 171 | 4 | 1 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| Osborn Richmond Richmond · 2024 | 169 | 6 | 2 | 3.5 | 2.6 |
| Osborn - Richmond Richmond · 2021 | 150 | 5 | 1 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i)
(c) Safeguarding the point of operation—(1) General requirements. (i) It shall be the responsibility of the employer to provide and insure the usage of “point of operation guards” or properly applied and adjusted point of operation devices on every operation performed on a mechanical power press. See Table O-10.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.