OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Oscar Ramos: OSHA inspections and violations

White Marsh, Maryland · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
4citation items
$1,050current penalties
Feb 20, 2018last inspection

Oscar Ramos has one OSHA inspection on record in Maryland.

OSHA opened it on Feb 20, 2018 as a planned inspection, in White Marsh, and the case has not closed yet.

From that inspection OSHA issued 4 citation items: 4 serious.

OSHA proposed $1,050 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.502, fall protection systems (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Oscar Ramos averages $1,050 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Oscar Ramos: OSHA citation items per year, 2018 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records

197employers cited

39 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Maryland

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Oscar Ramos and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342958956 OPENED FEB 20, 2018Open

Planned · Complete · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Open

5321 Kenzie Audrey Court, White Marsh, MD 21162 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,050$1,050Apr 24, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems
Serious$0$0Apr 24, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
Serious$0$0Apr 24, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Apr 24, 2018Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)

(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17)

(17) The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Maryland

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.