Inspection 347737629 OPENED SEP 6, 2024Closed
12738 American Sweetgum Way, Hockley, TX 77447 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Oseas Rodriguez 5 times in Texas since 2020.
The latest one began on Sep 6, 2024, in Hockley.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $48,450 and now stand at $45,578, 6% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Oseas Rodriguez averages $15,193 (3 cited inspections).
1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.
Want to know if OSHA cites Oseas Rodriguez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company12738 American Sweetgum Way, Hockley, TX 77447 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
365 Selah Ct., Alvin, TX 77511 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
365 Selah Ct, Alvin, TX 77511 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $5,323 | $5,323 | Jan 23, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $26,616 | $26,616 | Jan 23, 2024 | Final |
23434 Pagoda Oak Drive, Spring, TX 77373 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Apr 7, 2022 (fatal): Employee dies after falling from deck
At 3:00 p.m. on April 7, 2022, an employee was installing roof decking on a residential home. As the employee stepped on the edge of the fascia board, it gave way and the employee fell to the concrete below. The employee sustained multiple blunt force injuries and was transported to the hospital, where he died two days later.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $9,571 | $6,699 | May 26, 2022 | Final |
311 Lavatera Sunset, Willis, TX 77378 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,048 | $4,048 | Apr 16, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,892 | $2,892 | Apr 16, 2020 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.