OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Panera, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Jessup, Maryland · Retail Bakeries · NAICS 311811

2inspections
8citation items
$6,525current penalties
Mar 2, 2020last inspection

OSHA has inspected Panera, LLC 2 times in Maryland since 2020.

The latest one began on Mar 2, 2020 on a referral, in Jessup.

Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 4 serious and 4 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $11,562 and now stand at $6,525, 44% lower after settlements or reviews.

Noise comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.95.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,874, and Panera, LLC averages $3,262 (2 cited inspections).

Panera, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Panera, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344666904 OPENED MAR 2, 2020Closed

Referral · Partial · Health · 141 employees at the site · Closed Dec 15, 2020

7801 Dorsey Run Road, Jessup, MD 20794 · Retail Bakeries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Serious$1,875$938Nov 20, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection
 Serious$2,250$1,125Nov 20, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 1 Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 20, 2020Final

Inspection 344666565 OPENED FEB 28, 2020Closed

Accident · Complete · Safety · 141 employees at the site · Closed Oct 13, 2020

7801 Dorsey Run Road, Jessup, MD 20794 · Retail Bakeries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Feb 27, 2020: Employee partially amputates finger in tray washer conveyor

At 12:00 p.m. on February 27, 2020, Employee #1 was feeding sheet pans into a Douglas Commercial Tunnel Washer via a 20-inch-wide metal mesh conveyor belt. While loading pans into the machine, one of them became stuck and the employee attempted to remove the pan from the front of the machine while it was still running. The employee held onto the machine with his left hand and reached to retrieve the pan with his right hand at which point, his left hand was caught by the conveyor. The conveyor was moving an approximate speed of 23 feet per minute and was located 42-1/2 inches from the floor. The employee was transported to the hospital, where he was treated for a partial amputation of the left pinky finger. Hospitalization was not required.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
 Serious$2,975$1,785Aug 4, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(4) · Guarding of portable powered tools
 Serious$1,275$765Aug 4, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i) · Electrical equipment, general requirements
 Other-than-serious$1,062$637Aug 4, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii) · Electrical wiring methods
 Other-than-serious$2,125$1,275Aug 4, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(a) · Electrical wiring methods
 Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 4, 2020Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.133 · Eye and face protection

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)

(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.243 · Guarding of portable powered tools

29 CFR 1910.243(c)(4)

(4) Other portable grinders. The maximum angular exposure of the grinding wheel periphery and sides for safety guards used on other portable grinding machines shall not exceed 180° and the top half of the wheel shall be enclosed at all times. (See Figures P-5 and P-6.)

29 CFR 1910.303 · Electrical equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.305 · Electrical wiring methods

29 CFR 1910.95 · Noise

Other retail bakeries employers in Maryland

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.