OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Paradigm Precision: OSHA inspections and violations

Manchester, Connecticut · Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing · NAICS 336412

2inspections
6citation items
$13,686current penalties
Feb 21, 2018last inspection

Since 2017, OSHA inspectors have visited Paradigm Precision in Connecticut 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Feb 21, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Manchester.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $19,551; today they stand at $13,686, 30% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.217 (mechanical power presses), 3 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Paradigm Precision averages $6,843 across 2 cited inspections.

Paradigm Precision also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Paradigm Precision: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Paradigm Precision again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342967734 OPENED FEB 21, 2018Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 310 employees at the site · Closed May 29, 2018

967 Parker Street, Manchester, CT 06042 · Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.169(b)(3)(i) · Air receivers
 Serious$3,604$2,523Apr 11, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(12) · Mechanical power presses
 Serious$0$0Apr 11, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
 Serious$7,068$4,948Apr 11, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(3)(iv)(d) · Mechanical power presses
 Serious$7,068$4,948Apr 11, 2018Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(6)(ii) · Mechanical power presses
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 11, 2018Final

Inspection 342365301 OPENED JUN 1, 2017Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 360 employees at the site · Closed Oct 20, 2017

186 Adams Street, Manchester, CT 06042 · Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1904.30(a) · Multiple business establishments
 Other-than-serious$1,811$1,268Oct 2, 2017Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2019, the Manchester site logged 2 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 71 workers: 3.4 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.1 for its industry. Those cases cost 20 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Building 3
Manchester · 2019
71 213.41.1
Building 1
Manchester · 2018
147 717.41.1
Building 4
Manchester · 2018
92 305.11.1
Building 5
Manchester · 2018
50 000.01.1
Building 2
Manchester · 2018
6 000.01.1

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1904.30 · Multiple business establishments

29 CFR 1904.30(a)

(a) Basic requirement. You must keep a separate OSHA 300 Log for each establishment that is expected to be in operation for one year or longer.

29 CFR 1910.169 · Air receivers

29 CFR 1910.169(b)(3)(i)

(3) Gages and valves. (i) Every air receiver shall be equipped with an indicating pressure gage (so located as to be readily visible) and with one or more spring-loaded safety valves. The total relieving capacity of such safety valves shall be such as to prevent pressure in the receiver from exceeding the maximum allowable working pressure of the receiver by more than 10 percent.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.217 · Mechanical power presses

Other aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing employers in Connecticut

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.