Ontario, California · Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · NAICS 339991
8inspections
23citation items
$29,392current penalties
Mar 8, 2019last inspection
OSHA has inspected Parco, LLC. 8 times in California since 1987.
The latest one began on Mar 8, 2019 after a complaint, in Ontario.
Those inspections ended with 23 citation items: 9 serious and 14 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $92,115 and now stand at $29,392, 68% lower after settlements or reviews.
Exit routes comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1910.37.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Parco, LLC. averages $1,120 (1 cited inspection).
Parco, LLC. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Incident on Jun 25, 2010: Employee caught in a running conveyor and lacerates hand
At approximately 5:30 p.m. on June 25, 2010, Employee #1 was removing a rubber p iece from a running conveyor, when his right hand was caught between the unguard ed roller and conveyor. He was treated and released from a hospital; however, fi ve days later, he had hand surgery and his right thumb was permanently disfigure d.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3999 B
Serious
$18,000
$2,700
Dec 23, 2010
Final
Inspection 307456715 OPENED MAY 11, 2005Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 210 employees at the site · Closed Aug 15, 2015
Incident on Apr 15, 2005: Employee amputates finger using molding press
At approximately 6:00 p.m. on April 15, 2005, Employee #1 was changing the mold on compression molding machine Number 474 located in the molding department. Emp loyee #1 removed four bolts from the front and back of the mold and then pressed the automatic button to allow the press to automatically come down. As the pres s was coming down, Employee #1 attempted to use his right index finger to push o ut a part that was on the side of the press where there was an unguarded opening that was 2-ft long, 2-in. wide and 4-in. deep. As Employee #1's right index fin ger was in the opening, the press came down and struck his finger causing an amp utation. Employee #1 was treated for his injuries but was not hospitalized.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342 A
Other-than-serious
$5,000
$0
Oct 17, 2005
Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious
$18,000
$2,700
Oct 17, 2005
Final
Inspection 300857539 OPENED APR 5, 2002Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 185 employees at the site · Closed Mar 31, 2004
Incident on Mar 18, 2002: Employee injured while operating grinder
At approximately 8:00 a.m. on March 18, 2002, Employee #1 was operating a Cincin nati grinder Model 625, Serial Number 35323D5V-0005, to grind a rubber seal. The grinder wheel and chuck used for mounting the seal were rotating in the opposit e direction to create a pinch point. The employee was wearing latex gloves on hi s hands while operating the grinding machine. While grinding the first part, he went too close to the pinch point to check the size of the part and the loose pa rt of the glove on his left hand got pulled into the pinch point. His left middl e finger got crushed in the pinch point. The accident resulted in amputation of his left middle finger and a severe laceration on his index and ring finger. The employee was transported to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and was hospitali zed for 2 days. The employer, Parco Inc., manufactures rubber seals.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3384 B
Serious
$18,000
$300
Aug 16, 2002
Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious
$18,000
$18,000
Aug 16, 2002
Final
Inspection 119957561 OPENED SEP 27, 1997Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 200 employees at the site · Closed Dec 19, 1997
Incident on Jun 24, 1997: Employee injured when laminating machine caught his finger
At 11:30 p.m. on June 24, 1997, Employee #1 smashed his right middle finger when the laminating machine he was attempting to unjam cycled. Several days after th e accident, the employee returned to the medical clinic where he was initially t reated and his finger tip was surgically amputated.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 125959619 OPENED DEC 10, 1996Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 200 employees at the site · Closed Jul 2, 1997
Incident on Oct 7, 1996: Employee's finger partially amputated in stamping machine
At approximately 9:45 a.m. on October 7, 1996, Employee #1 was engraving a part on a Schmidt metal stamping machine when she partially amputated the first joint of her right middle finger. She was transported to the Inland Industrial Medica l Clinic, where she was treated and released. The Division proposed the employer be cited for a serious violation of T8CCR 4184(b) because the stamping machine did not have a guard at the point of operation.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious
$5,000
$750
Jan 7, 1997
Closed
Inspection 100948496 OPENED OCT 15, 1987Closed
Complaint · Complete · Safety · 300 employees at the site · Closed Jan 15, 1988
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2023, the Ontario site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 146 workers: 0.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.5 for its industry.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Parco, LLC
Ontario · 2023
146
1
0
0.6
2.5
Parco
Ontario · 2019
160
12
8
7.2
2.5
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
(b) Compressed gases. The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks shall be in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in § 1910.6.
29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
29 CFR 1910.132(a)
(a) Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.