OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Parco, LLC.: OSHA inspections and violations

Ontario, California · Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · NAICS 339991

8inspections
23citation items
$29,392current penalties
Mar 8, 2019last inspection

OSHA has inspected Parco, LLC. 8 times in California since 1987.

The latest one began on Mar 8, 2019 after a complaint, in Ontario.

Those inspections ended with 23 citation items: 9 serious and 14 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $92,115 and now stand at $29,392, 68% lower after settlements or reviews.

Exit routes comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1910.37.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Parco, LLC. averages $1,120 (1 cited inspection).

Parco, LLC. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Parco, LLC.: OSHA citation items per year, 1987 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,128employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Parco, LLC. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343839247 OPENED MAR 8, 2019Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 160 employees at the site · Closed Oct 8, 2019

1801 S. Archibald Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 · Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3650(T)(33)
Other-than-serious$560$560Aug 30, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 5144(D)(1)(A)
Other-than-serious$560$560Aug 30, 2019Final

Inspection 316350446 OPENED JUL 28, 2014Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 250 employees at the site · Closed Sep 8, 2015

1801 Archibald Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 · Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3241 C
Other-than-serious$375$150Dec 24, 2014Final
Citation 1, item 2 Other-than-serious$375$150Dec 24, 2014Final
Citation 1, item 3 Other-than-serious$375$150Dec 24, 2014Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4075 A
Serious$6,750$2,700Dec 24, 2014Final

Inspection 313510067 OPENED AUG 2, 2010Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 230 employees at the site · Closed Jan 19, 2012

1801 S Archibald Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 · Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jun 25, 2010: Employee caught in a running conveyor and lacerates hand

At approximately 5:30 p.m. on June 25, 2010, Employee #1 was removing a rubber p iece from a running conveyor, when his right hand was caught between the unguard ed roller and conveyor. He was treated and released from a hospital; however, fi ve days later, he had hand surgery and his right thumb was permanently disfigure d.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3999 B
Serious$18,000$2,700Dec 23, 2010Final

Inspection 307456715 OPENED MAY 11, 2005Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 210 employees at the site · Closed Aug 15, 2015

1801 S Archibald Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 · Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Apr 15, 2005: Employee amputates finger using molding press

At approximately 6:00 p.m. on April 15, 2005, Employee #1 was changing the mold on compression molding machine Number 474 located in the molding department. Emp loyee #1 removed four bolts from the front and back of the mold and then pressed the automatic button to allow the press to automatically come down. As the pres s was coming down, Employee #1 attempted to use his right index finger to push o ut a part that was on the side of the press where there was an unguarded opening that was 2-ft long, 2-in. wide and 4-in. deep. As Employee #1's right index fin ger was in the opening, the press came down and struck his finger causing an amp utation. Employee #1 was treated for his injuries but was not hospitalized.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342 A
Other-than-serious$5,000$0Oct 17, 2005Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious$18,000$2,700Oct 17, 2005Final

Inspection 300857539 OPENED APR 5, 2002Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 185 employees at the site · Closed Mar 31, 2004

1801 S Archibald Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 18, 2002: Employee injured while operating grinder

At approximately 8:00 a.m. on March 18, 2002, Employee #1 was operating a Cincin nati grinder Model 625, Serial Number 35323D5V-0005, to grind a rubber seal. The grinder wheel and chuck used for mounting the seal were rotating in the opposit e direction to create a pinch point. The employee was wearing latex gloves on hi s hands while operating the grinding machine. While grinding the first part, he went too close to the pinch point to check the size of the part and the loose pa rt of the glove on his left hand got pulled into the pinch point. His left middl e finger got crushed in the pinch point. The accident resulted in amputation of his left middle finger and a severe laceration on his index and ring finger. The employee was transported to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and was hospitali zed for 2 days. The employer, Parco Inc., manufactures rubber seals.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3384 B
Serious$18,000$300Aug 16, 2002Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious$18,000$18,000Aug 16, 2002Final

Inspection 119957561 OPENED SEP 27, 1997Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 200 employees at the site · Closed Dec 19, 1997

2150 Parco Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jun 24, 1997: Employee injured when laminating machine caught his finger

At 11:30 p.m. on June 24, 1997, Employee #1 smashed his right middle finger when the laminating machine he was attempting to unjam cycled. Several days after th e accident, the employee returned to the medical clinic where he was initially t reated and his finger tip was surgically amputated.

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 125959619 OPENED DEC 10, 1996Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 200 employees at the site · Closed Jul 2, 1997

2150 Parco Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Oct 7, 1996: Employee's finger partially amputated in stamping machine

At approximately 9:45 a.m. on October 7, 1996, Employee #1 was engraving a part on a Schmidt metal stamping machine when she partially amputated the first joint of her right middle finger. She was transported to the Inland Industrial Medica l Clinic, where she was treated and released. The Division proposed the employer be cited for a serious violation of T8CCR 4184(b) because the stamping machine did not have a guard at the point of operation.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 4184 B
Serious$5,000$750Jan 7, 1997Closed

Inspection 100948496 OPENED OCT 15, 1987Closed

Complaint · Complete · Safety · 300 employees at the site · Closed Jan 15, 1988

2150 Parco Ave., Ontario, CA 91761 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Serious$320$192Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) · Guarding of portable powered tools
Serious$400$240Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(4) · Grounding and circuit protection
Serious$400$240Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.36(b)(5) · Exit route design
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.37(q)(4) · Exit routes
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.37(q)(5) · Exit routes
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 2c
29 CFR 1910.37(q)(8) · Exit routes
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1910.101(b) · Compressed gases (general requirements)
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 4
29 CFR 1910.132(a) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 5
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed
Citation 2, item 6
29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 21, 1987Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2023, the Ontario site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 146 workers: 0.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.5 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Parco, LLC
Ontario · 2023
146 100.62.5
Parco
Ontario · 2019
160 1287.22.5

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.101 · Compressed gases (general requirements)

29 CFR 1910.101(b)

(b) Compressed gases. The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks shall be in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in § 1910.6.

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(a)

(a) Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.242 · Hand and power tools

29 CFR 1910.243 · Guarding of portable powered tools

29 CFR 1910.304 · Grounding and circuit protection

29 CFR 1910.36 · Exit route design

29 CFR 1910.37 · Exit routes

29 CFR 2340.16

29 CFR 2340.21

Other gasket, packing, and sealing device manufacturing employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.