OSHA has inspected PCJ Services Inc 2 times in Florida since 2024.
The latest one began on Apr 28, 2026, in Pompano Beach; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $18,536 and still stand at $18,536.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and PCJ Services Inc averages $9,268 (2 cited inspections).
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites PCJ Services Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1200 Ne 23rd Street, Pompano Beach, FL 33062 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $11,916 | $11,916 | Jun 3, 2026 | Final |
36 Thatch Palm Way, Key Largo, FL 33037 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $6,620 | $6,620 | Feb 13, 2025 | Final |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Aug 20, 2024, Key Largo: Hospitalization · fractures · ankle(s)
An employee was walking with a wheelbarrow on a roof when they slipped and fell to the ground. The employee sustained a displaced malleolus fracture to their ankle, which required surgery to repair.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.