Washington, District of Columbia · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
OSHA has inspected Perez Bros Construction once in District of Columbia.
The inspection began on Nov 17, 2022 as a planned inspection, in Washington; the case is still open.
That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 2 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,968 and still stand at $7,968.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Perez Bros Construction averages $7,968 (1 cited inspection).
District of Columbia · latest 90 days of OSHA records
14employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in District of Columbia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in District of Columbia
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Perez Bros Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company655 Columbia Road Nw, Washington, DC 20001 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $3,984 | $3,984 | May 16, 2023 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,984 | $3,984 | May 16, 2023 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in District of Columbia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.