OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Phillips Signs: OSHA inspections and violations

Seaford, Delaware · Other Building Equipment Contractors · NAICS 238290

2inspections
9citation items
$5,325current penalties
Sep 16, 2015last inspection

OSHA has inspected Phillips Signs 2 times in Delaware since 1993.

The latest one began on Sep 16, 2015 on a referral, in Dover.

Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 8 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $6,025 and now stand at $5,325, 12% lower after settlements or reviews.

Woodworking machinery comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.213.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Phillips Signs averages $2,100 (1 cited inspection).

Phillips Signs: OSHA citation items per year, 1993 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Phillips Signs again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340924430 OPENED SEP 16, 2015Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Oct 20, 2015

1165 Dupont Highway, Dover, DE 19901 · Other Building Equipment Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) · Aerial lifts
Serious$2,800$2,100Oct 15, 2015Final

Inspection 17531351 OPENED MAR 30, 1993Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 11 employees at the site · Closed Jan 5, 2011

Rd 4, Box 751 - Rt. 13n, Seaford, DE 19973 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$750$750Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Serious$525$525Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1) · Woodworking machinery
Serious$750$750Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4) · Woodworking machinery
Serious$0$0Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(4) · Grounding and circuit protection
Serious$525$525Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 5a
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$525$525Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 1, item 5b
29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Apr 7, 1993Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1904.2(a) · Partial exemption for establishments in certain industries
Other-than-serious$150$150Apr 7, 1993Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1904.2 · Partial exemption for establishments in certain industries

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)

(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.213 · Woodworking machinery

29 CFR 1910.304 · Grounding and circuit protection

29 CFR 1926.453 · Aerial lifts

Other other building equipment contractors employers in Delaware

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.