Salt Lake City, Utah · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
Since 2019, OSHA inspectors have visited Pro Roofing UT in Utah 6 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Aug 22, 2025 on a referral, in Salt Lake City.
In all, OSHA issued 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $9,000; today they stand at $7,575, 16% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Pro Roofing UT averages $1,515 across 5 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites Pro Roofing UT again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company3990 S 700 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84114 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,100 | $1,050 | Oct 6, 2025 | Final |
6439 West 10630 North, Highland, UT 84003 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
3990 S 700 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84123 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Oct 1, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $750 | $750 | Oct 1, 2021 | Final |
9 La Montagne, Sandy, UT 84092 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Oct 8, 2020 | Final |
1492 S 1020 E, Orem, UT 84097 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR UAC R614-1-5.B.1 |
Other-than-serious | $500 | $500 | Aug 19, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR UAC R614-1-5.B.2 |
Other-than-serious | $500 | $500 | Aug 19, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $400 | $400 | Aug 19, 2020 | Final |
758 S Aspen Cir, Provo, UT 84604 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1) · Electrical safety in construction |
Serious | $750 | $375 | May 2, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3) · Electrical safety in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | May 2, 2019 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1)
(a) Protection of employees. (1) No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3)
(3) Before work is begun the employer shall ascertain by inquiry or direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, is so located that the performance of the work may bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. The employer shall post and maintain proper warning signs where such a circuit exists. The employer shall advise employees of the location of such lines, the hazards involved, and the protective measures to be taken.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.