Propak has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Missouri, the first in 2014.
OSHA's last visit started on Aug 23, 2023 on a referral, in Jackson.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 3 citation items: 2 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $18,325 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $11,890, down 35%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.303, electrical equipment, general requirements (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,500. Propak averages $10,000 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Propak again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company14916 Hwy 177, Jackson, MO 63755 · Wood Container and Pallet Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $15,625 | $10,000 | Nov 13, 2023 | Final |
1874 State Highway 177, Jackson, MO 63755 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
7301 Hall Street, Saint Louis, MO 63147 · Wood Container and Pallet Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $2,700 | $1,890 | Feb 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Feb 21, 2014 | Final |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Aug 17, 2023, Jackson: Amputation · amputations · toes(s), toenail(s)
An employee was restarting a conveyor when his foot contacted the chain. The employee's right little toe was crushed and the next toe was amputated above the knuckle area.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2)
(2) General requirements for machine guards. Guards shall be affixed to the machine where possible and secured elsewhere if for any reason attachment to the machine is not possible. The guard shall be such that it does not offer an accident hazard in itself.
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv)
(iv) There shall be no damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment, such as parts that are broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating.
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)
(e) Marking—(1) Identification of manufacturer and ratings. Electric equipment may not be used unless the following markings have been placed on the equipment:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.