Pte Inc has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2001.
OSHA's last visit started on Feb 15, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Mora.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $1,375 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $1,038, down 25%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.212, machine guarding (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Pte Inc averages $250 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Pte Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1518 Industrial Blvd, Mora, MN 55051 · Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1) · Hexavalent chromium |
Other-than-serious | $125 | $125 | May 18, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $125 | $125 | May 18, 2018 | Final |
1518 Industrial Blvd, Mora, MN 55051 · Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $150 | $105 | Apr 25, 2014 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $225 | $158 | Apr 25, 2014 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $375 | $262 | Apr 25, 2014 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 | Serious | $375 | $262 | Apr 25, 2014 | Closed |
1518 Industrial Blvd., Mora, MN 55051 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1)
(d) Exposure determination—(1) General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.