PVH Corp. has one OSHA inspection on record in North Carolina.
OSHA opened it on Oct 29, 2015 as a planned inspection, in Jonesville.
From that inspection OSHA issued 6 citation items: 2 serious and 4 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $3,900 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $2,730, down 30%.
For context, across all transportation and warehousing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,555. PVH Corp. averages $2,730 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
PVH Corp. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Want to know if OSHA cites PVH Corp. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Jonesville site logged 14 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 210 workers: 8.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.6 for its industry. Those cases cost 417 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
PVH Corp Jonesville Distribution Center
Jonesville · 2025
210
14
3
8.0
2.6
PVH Corp.
Jonesville · 2023
398
29
13
7.3
2.6
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)
(2) The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
(ii) The employer shall certify that the periodic inspections have been performed. The certification shall identify the machine or equipment on which the energy control procedure was being utilized, the date of the inspection, the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection.
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.
