Washington, District of Columbia · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
Quality Carpentry Group Inc. has 3 OSHA inspections on record in District of Columbia, the first in 2013.
OSHA's last visit started on Aug 9, 2017, in Washington.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 6 serious and 1 repeat.
OSHA proposed $21,156 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $14,472, down 32%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (3 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Quality Carpentry Group Inc. averages $7,512 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
District of Columbia · latest 90 days of OSHA records
14employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in District of Columbia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in District of Columbia
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Quality Carpentry Group Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company504 C Street, Ne, Washington, DC 20002 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.851(b) · Stairs, passageways, and ladders |
Serious | $2,390 | $1,650 | Sep 29, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $8,366 | $5,862 | Sep 29, 2017 | Final |
1335 Maryland Avenue, Ne, Washington, DC 20002 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $2,400 | Jan 24, 2014 | Final |
816 1/2 8th St., Ne, Washington, DC 20018 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,680 | Jul 18, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,680 | Jul 18, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 18, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,200 | Jul 18, 2013 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13)
(13) The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16)
(16) Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, shall either be immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with “Do Not Use” or similar language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in District of Columbia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.