Rafael Lopez has 6 OSHA inspections on record in Texas, the first in 2011.
OSHA's last visit started on Nov 17, 2022, in Mcallen.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 9 citation items: 8 serious and 1 repeat.
OSHA proposed $30,873 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $24,253, down 21%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (5 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Rafael Lopez averages $4,284 over 3 cited inspections in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Rafael Lopez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company14112 Madrid Falls, Mcallen, TX 78501 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $8,701 | $3,516 | Dec 16, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,486 | $1,851 | Dec 16, 2022 | Final |
14220 Gorman Falls, Mcallen, TX 78502 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,351 | $4,351 | Aug 16, 2022 | Contested |
2300 Mccoll Rd, Mcallen, TX 78501 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $3,135 | $3,135 | Sep 30, 2016 | Final |
906 Banyon, Austin, TX 78757 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.250(a)(1) · General requirements for storage |
Serious | $1,600 | $1,600 | Oct 10, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $3,200 | $3,200 | Oct 10, 2014 | Final |
4228 Toronto Ave, Mcallen, TX 78501 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,200 | Jun 20, 2013 | Final |
2724 Tom Miller Street, Austin, TX 78722 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,000 | $3,000 | Aug 5, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,400 | $2,400 | Aug 5, 2011 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13)
(13) The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4)
(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.