OSHA has inspected Reliable Propane 2 times in Missouri since 2005.
The latest one began on Jul 15, 2015 on a referral, in Sikeston.
Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,825 and now stand at $3,960, 49% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for retail employers since 2015 is $2,130, and Reliable Propane averages $1,960 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Reliable Propane again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company126 Larcel Drive, Sikeston, MO 63801 · Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1) · Process safety management |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,960 | Sep 29, 2015 | Final |
126 Larcel Drive, Sikeston, MO 63801 · Fuel Dealers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.110(b)(17)(v) · Storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases |
Serious | $1,500 | $500 | Jun 14, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3) · Portable fire extinguishers |
Serious | $225 | $500 | Jun 14, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.307(b) · Hazardous (classified) locations |
Serious | $1,500 | $500 | Jun 14, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $1,500 | $500 | Jun 14, 2005 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1904.29(b)(4) · Injury and illness log |
Other-than-serious | $300 | $0 | Jun 14, 2005 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(4)
(4) What is an equivalent form? An equivalent form is one that has the same information, is as readable and understandable, and is completed using the same instructions as the OSHA form it replaces. Many employers use an insurance form instead of the OSHA 301 Incident Report, or supplement an insurance form by adding any additional information required by OSHA.
29 CFR 1910.110(b)(17)(v)
(v) Open flames (except as provided for in paragraph (b)(11) of this section), cutting or welding, portable electric tools, and extension lights capable of igniting LP-Gas, shall not be permitted within classified areas specified in Table H-28 unless the LP-Gas facilities have been freed of all liquid and vapor, or special precautions observed under carefully controlled conditions.
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1)
(e) Process hazard analysis. (1) The employer shall perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by this standard. The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process. Employers shall determine and document the priority order for conducting process hazard analyses based on a rationale which includes such considerations as extent of the process hazards, number of potentially affected employees, age of the process, and operating history of the process. The process hazard analysis shall be conducted as soon as possible, but not later than the following schedule:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.