OSHA has inspected Repet, Inc. 5 times in California since 2011.
The latest one began on Jun 9, 2022 as part of a related case, in Chino.
Those inspections ended with 16 citation items: 6 serious and 10 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $105,420 and now stand at $88,005, 17% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,500, and Repet, Inc. averages $17,865 (3 cited inspections).
Inspection 316349034 OPENED MAR 18, 2014Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 120 employees at the site · Closed Nov 17, 2016
14207 Monte Vista Ave, Chino, CA 91710 · Recyclable Material Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Feb 26, 2014: Worker injured when struck by pipe wrench
At approximately 9:00 a.m. on February 26, 2014, Employee #1, a 22-year-old male material handler, with Kamran Staffing Inc., assigned to work at Repet Inc., wa s working with another coworker in the mud press area on line number one. Employ ee #1 transported barrels of mud using a forklift and the coworker assisted in d umping the mud into machine by cranking the barrel. During the process, the mud press became jammed; Employee #1 went to look for a mechanic while the coworker swept the floor. Employee #1 met another coworker and told him that the mud pres s was stuck and he needed to unjam the machine. Employee #1 went back to the mud press area and tried to unjam the machine by rotating the shaft of mud press us ing a Kobalt 24-in. pipe wrench, when another coworker came by in a forklift to bring barrels of mud. The coworker on the forklift asked what Employee #1 was do ing and he told the coworker that he was trying to unjam the machine. Employee # 1 was rotating the bottom shaft as coworker on the forklift was leaving the area . Suddenly the pipe wrench started to spin on the bottom shaft and it flew out t oward Employee #1. It hit Employee #1 on his left inner thigh. Employee #1 suffe red an unspecified fracture injury as the result of being struck by the wrench. The incident was caused because the equipment was not de-energizing or disengagi ng from the power source of the machine nor mechanically blocked or locked out t o prevent inadvertent movement or release of stored energy. Repet Inc. was a pro cessor of post-consumer PET bottle waste. Employee #1 was a contract worker with Kamran Staffing Inc., who had worked at Repet Inc., since November of 2013.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 3203 B01 |
Other-than-serious | $425 | $0 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 3273 A |
Other-than-serious | $635 | $175 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 3314 H |
Other-than-serious | $475 | $0 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 4001 |
Other-than-serious | $475 | $260 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5 29 CFR 5097 B |
Other-than-serious | $795 | $175 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 3314 C |
Serious | $18,000 | $18,000 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 3, item 1 29 CFR 3314 G |
Serious | $7,650 | $0 | Jul 21, 2014 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.