OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Ricardo's Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Oconomowoc, Wisconsin · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

1inspections
4citation items
$12,457current penalties
Jul 2, 2025last inspection

OSHA has inspected Ricardo's Construction once in Wisconsin.

The inspection began on Jul 2, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Oconomowoc; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 4 citation items: 3 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $12,457 and still stand at $12,457.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Ricardo's Construction averages $12,457 (1 cited inspection).

Ricardo's Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2025 to 2025
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Wisconsin · latest 90 days of OSHA records

232employers cited

16 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Wisconsin: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Wisconsin

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Ricardo's Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348350810 OPENED JUL 2, 2025Open

Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Open

1742 Hammock Lane, Oconomowoc, WI 53066 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$3,547$3,547Jul 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,256$4,256Jul 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$4,256$4,256Jul 22, 2025Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed
 Other-than-serious$398$398Dec 1, 2025Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1903.19 · Proving cited hazards were fixed

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1)

(d) Abatement documentation. (1) The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other framing contractors employers in Wisconsin

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Wisconsin the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.