OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Richard's Construction Experts LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Lake Saint Louis, Missouri · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
5citation items
$15,215current penalties
Oct 8, 2020last inspection

Since 2020, OSHA inspectors have visited Richard's Construction Experts LLC in Missouri 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Oct 8, 2020 as a planned inspection, in Saint Peters and is still open.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 5 serious.

The penalties, $15,215 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1926.503 (fall protection training in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Richard's Construction Experts LLC averages $7,608 across 2 cited inspections.

Richard's Construction Experts LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Richard's Construction Experts LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344981055 OPENED OCT 8, 2020Open

Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Open

798 Bear Mountain Drive, Saint Peters, MO 63376 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$2,341$2,341Feb 2, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,096$4,096Feb 2, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$2,341$2,341Feb 2, 2021Final

Inspection 344959721 OPENED OCT 1, 2020Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Dec 26, 2023

42 Dauphine Drive, Lake Saint Louis, MO 63367 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,096$4,096Feb 2, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$2,341$2,341Feb 2, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)

(a) Training program. (1) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.

Other roofing contractors employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.