OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Ridgeline Developement LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Carson City, Nevada · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · NAICS 236115

3inspections
3citation items
$5,965current penalties
Aug 10, 2021last inspection

OSHA has inspected Ridgeline Developement LLC 3 times in Nevada since 2014.

The latest one began on Aug 10, 2021 as part of a related case, in Carson City.

Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $8,521 and now stand at $5,965, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Ridgeline Developement LLC averages $2,982 (2 cited inspections).

Ridgeline Developement LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2014 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Ridgeline Developement LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345467518 OPENED AUG 10, 2021Closed

Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Jan 7, 2022

1668 Bluebird Ct., Carson City, NV 89703 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$5,461$3,823Oct 20, 2021Final

Inspection 343078309 OPENED APR 10, 2018Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Jul 10, 2018

2067 Canterbury Ln., Carson City, NV 89703 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,530$1,071Apr 26, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems
Serious$1,530$1,071Apr 26, 2018Final

Inspection 317540631 OPENED FEB 12, 2014Closed

Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Mar 21, 2014

2928 Promontory Loop, Genoa, NV 89411 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)

(15) Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:

Other new single-family housing construction (except for-sale builders) employers in Nevada

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.