Inspection 342288198 OPENED APR 21, 2017Closed
102 Anna Cove, Ridgeland, MS 39157 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Ridgeland, Mississippi · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · NAICS 236115
OSHA has inspected Robert Lopez 2 times in Mississippi since 2016.
The latest one began on Apr 21, 2017 to follow up on an earlier case, in Ridgeland.
Those inspections ended with 10 citation items: 10 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $16,835 and still stand at $16,835.
Scaffolds, general requirements comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.451.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and Robert Lopez averages $16,835 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Robert Lopez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company102 Anna Cove, Ridgeland, MS 39157 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
102 Anna Cove, Ridgeland, MS 39157 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.25(a) · Housekeeping |
Serious | $1,924 | $1,924 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.304(d) · Woodworking tools |
Serious | $2,405 | $2,405 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3a 29 CFR 1926.404(f)(7)(iv)(c)(1) · Ground-fault protection on job sites |
Serious | $1,924 | $1,924 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3b 29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii) · Job-site wiring |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4a 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $2,405 | $2,405 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4b 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $2,405 | $2,405 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 6 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $1,443 | $1,443 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 7 29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training |
Serious | $1,443 | $1,443 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 8 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,886 | $2,886 | Nov 7, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.25(a)
(a) During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails, and all other debris, shall be kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures.
29 CFR 1926.304(d)
(d) Guarding. All portable, power-driven circular saws shall be equipped with guards above and below the base plate or shoe. The upper guard shall cover the saw to the depth of the teeth, except for the minimum arc required to permit the base to be tilted for bevel cuts. The lower guard shall cover the saw to the depth of the teeth, except for the minimum arc required to allow proper retraction and contact with the work. When the tool is withdrawn from the work, the lower guard shall automatically and instantly return to the covering position.
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(7)(iv)(c)(1)
(C) If the equipment is one of the types listed in paragraphs (f)(7)(iv)(C)(1) through (f)(7)(iv)(C)(5) of this section. However, even though the equipment may be one of these types, it need not be grounded if it is exempted by paragraph (f)(7)(iv)(C)(6).
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.