Inspection 342032000 OPENED JAN 18, 2017Closed
322 W Gregson Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 · Reupholstery and Furniture Repair · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Salt Lake City, Utah · Reupholstery and Furniture Repair · NAICS 811420
Roger Donio has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Utah, the first in 2016.
OSHA's last visit started on Jan 18, 2017 to follow up on an earlier case, in Salt Lake City.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $3,150 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.1052, methylene chloride (4 items).
For context, across all repair and personal services employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $1,200. Roger Donio averages $3,150 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Roger Donio again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company322 W Gregson Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 · Reupholstery and Furniture Repair · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
322 W Gregson Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 · Reupholstery and Furniture Repair · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.1052(c)(1) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.1052(e)(1) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1910.1052(f)(1) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $150 | $150 | Sep 7, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1052(c)(1)
(c) Permissible exposure limits (PELs)—(1) Eight-hour time-weighted average (TWA) PEL. The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of MC in excess of twenty-five parts of MC per million parts of air (25 ppm) as an 8-hour TWA.
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i)
(d) Exposure monitoring—(1) Characterization of employee exposure. (i) Where MC is present in the workplace, the employer shall determine each employee's exposure by either:
29 CFR 1910.1052(e)(1)
(e) Regulated areas. (1) The employer shall establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of MC exceeds or can reasonably be expected to exceed either the 8-hour TWA PEL or the STEL.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.