OSHA has inspected Rosendo Compean 2 times in Texas since 2014.
The latest one began on Feb 20, 2018, in Austin.
Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $6,439 and now stand at $4,839, 25% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Rosendo Compean averages $2,439 (1 cited inspection).
Texas · latest 90 days of OSHA records
391employers cited
48 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Texas: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Texas
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Rosendo Compean and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company8300 Bluff Springs Road, Austin, TX 78738 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,439 | $2,439 | Apr 26, 2018 | Final |
11119 Alterra Parkway, Austin, TX 78758 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,200 | $720 | Jan 13, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,680 | Jan 13, 2015 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii)
(ii) Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges are under construction, but who is not engaged in the leading edge work, shall be protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. If a guardrail system is chosen to provide the fall protection, and a controlled access zone has already been established for leading edge work, the control line may be used in lieu of a guardrail along the edge that parallels the leading edge.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Texas the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.