OSHA has inspected Ross Plastering, Inc. 7 times in California since 2008.
The latest one began on Mar 16, 2015 as part of a related case, in Santa Ana.
Those inspections ended with 17 citation items: 4 serious and 13 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $77,545 and now stand at $16,355, 79% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Ross Plastering, Inc. averages $3,300 (1 cited inspection).
Inspection 312430085 OPENED NOV 21, 2008Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Apr 28, 2010
9222 Corbin Ave., Northridge, CA 91324 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Nov 21, 2008: Four employees are injured when scaffold collapses
At approximately 12:15 p.m., on November 21, 2008, four employees were working o n a scaffold that was being erected in the courtyard of a multi-unit apartment c omplex under construction. Two of the employees were erecting the scaffolding. T he other two employees were part of a crew that was delivering drywall. The scaf fold was being erected in two side by side sections that were bridged. The weste rn section of the scaffolding was completed under the direction of a Qualified S caffold Erector. The eastern section of the scaffold was being erected after the completion of the western section. The eastern section was erected by another c rew. The eastern section of scaffolding was built up to the fifth level, approxi mately 32 ft 3 in. high. A Gradall Model No. 544-D entered the courtyard through the north entrance with a bundle of green board drywall. Based on conflicting w itness statements, and no direct evidence, if it is not clear whether or not the Gradall struck the scaffolding. Employees #1, 2, 3, and 4 were injured when the scaffold collapsed. Three of the employees fell to the ground. One employee was able to jump from the scaffold into a window opening. An investigation revealed that not all of the required ties between the scaffold and the buildings were i nstalled. Employee #1 was hospitalized for unspecified fractures. Employee #2 wa s hospitalized for a concussion. Employees #3 and 4 were hospitalized for unspec ified contusions and abrasions.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1637 N01 |
Other-than-serious | $5,060 | $0 | May 20, 2009 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1644 A05 |
Serious | $18,000 | $505 | May 20, 2009 | Final |
| Citation 3, item 1 29 CFR 1637 K03 |
Serious | $18,000 | $5,060 | May 20, 2009 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.