Saint Robert, Missouri · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA inspectors have visited RS Roofing Construction in Missouri one time.
It opened on Jul 20, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Saint Robert.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The penalties, $4,400 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. RS Roofing Construction averages $4,400 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites RS Roofing Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company103 Saint Robert Blvd, Saint Robert, MO 65584 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,600 | $1,600 | Jul 29, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $2,800 | Jul 29, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1)
(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges. Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.