OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

SA General Construction LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Manchester, Connecticut · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
5citation items
$13,292current penalties
Nov 15, 2024last inspection

OSHA has inspected SA General Construction LLC 2 times in Connecticut since 2024.

The latest one began on Nov 15, 2024 on a referral, in Wethersfield.

Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 5 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $18,989 and now stand at $13,292, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and SA General Construction LLC averages $6,646 (2 cited inspections).

SA General Construction LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2024 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites SA General Construction LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347883712 OPENED NOV 15, 2024Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Sep 3, 2026

1075 Silas Deane Highway, Wethersfield, CT 06109 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$2,837$1,986Apr 1, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,965$3,476Apr 1, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$4,965$3,476Apr 1, 2025Final

Inspection 347753782 OPENED SEP 13, 2024Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 10 employees at the site · Closed Jan 28, 2025

317 Highland St/, Manchester, CT 06040 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$2,765$1,936Dec 19, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$3,457$2,420Dec 19, 2024Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)

(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

Other roofing contractors employers in Connecticut

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.