Santa Fe Springs, California · Site Preparation Contractors · NAICS 238910
Since 2003, OSHA inspectors have visited Salsbury Engineering, Inc. in California 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jun 22, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Porter Ranch.
In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 5 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $15,770; today they stand at $2,585, 84% less.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Salsbury Engineering, Inc. averages $135 across 1 cited inspection.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
5 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in California
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Salsbury Engineering, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this companyPoter Ranch Dr. & Rinaldi St., Porter Ranch, CA 91326 · Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 3395(I) |
Other-than-serious | $135 | $135 | Nov 8, 2018 | Final |
13021 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Oct 20, 2003: Employee's legs fractured when struck by backing loader
At approximately 2:30 p.m. on October 20, 2003, Employee #1, a grade checker for Salsbury Engineering, Inc., was working at a construction site in Santa Fe Spri ngs, CA. He was putting stakes in the ground to mark places that needed to be ba ckfilled with dirt when he was struck by a Caterpillar 980C loader being driven by a coworker. Employee #1 sustained fractures to both legs and was hospitalized for treatment. The coworker was backing up and did not see Employee #1. The emp loyer did not ensure that employees using earth-moving equipment were aware of c oworkers such rootpickers, spotters, lab technicians, surveyors, or other worker s on foot in the area of operation.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1509 C |
Other-than-serious | $685 | $250 | Apr 12, 2004 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1524 A01 |
Other-than-serious | $275 | $200 | Apr 12, 2004 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1524 A04 |
Other-than-serious | $275 | $0 | Apr 12, 2004 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1592 E |
Other-than-serious | $14,400 | $2,000 | Apr 12, 2004 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.