Schmidbauer Lumber Inc has 17 OSHA inspections on record in California, the first in 1993.
OSHA's last visit started on Apr 3, 2025 after a complaint, in Eureka.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 27 citation items: 11 serious and 16 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $83,020 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $63,220, down 24%.
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,500. Schmidbauer Lumber Inc averages $13,661 over 4 cited inspections in that time.
Schmidbauer Lumber Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
California · latest 90 days of OSHA records
1,128employers cited
2 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Incident on Aug 20, 2019: Employee's left thumb is amputated in machine
At 3:00 p.m. on August 20, 2019, an employee was removing a cross up on #1 Edger. When the employee went to remove a cross up, his hand came into contact with the pipple arms of the pipple machine, as it was in the downward motion and amputated his left thumb. The employee was hospitalized.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 4002(A)
Serious
$22,500
$16,200
Oct 29, 2019
Final
Inspection 342874831 OPENED JAN 11, 2018Closed
Planned · No inspection · Safety · 130 employees at the site · Closed Jan 16, 2018
Incident on Jul 24, 2007: Employee's finger is amputated by chipper blade
On July 24, 2007, Employee #1, an oiler and maintenance worker at a saw mill, wa s assisting with changing the knives on a horizontal feed chipper. The chipper c ontrols were locked out. A millwright was rotating the chipper head by hand to c heck the clearance of the knives to the anvil. Employee #1 was watching the kniv es pass the anvil to check proper adjustment. For an unknown reason, the employe e placed his right hand below the anvil as the chipper head was rotated. The sha rp knife amputated the top portion of his right index finger. Employee #1's inju ry did not require hospitalization. The employee stated he knew better and could not explain why he placed his hand near the moving chipper head.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 125820266 OPENED JAN 25, 2007Closed
Complaint · Partial · Safety · 170 employees at the site · Closed Feb 5, 2007
Incident on May 23, 2001: Mechanic injured while repairing a caterpillar bobcat
On May 23, 2001, a sawmill mechanic was making repairs to the tilt cylinder on a Caterpillar 216 Skid Steer Bobcat. The mechanic raised the bucket of the Bobcat and placed a support under it to prevent it from falling while he was working o n the bucket cylinder. The employee loosened the connections on the hydraulic cy linder, allowing the hydraulic fluid to leak out of the cylinder. The employee w as lying on the shop floor under the Bobcat to complete the repair, when he acci dentally kicked the support loose, and the bucket frame moved downward onto the employee's head. The employee was pinned to the floor by the bucket frame. He wa s hospitalized with injuries to his skull.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 125725523 OPENED AUG 16, 2000Closed
Complaint · Partial · Safety · 160 employees at the site · Closed Dec 22, 2000
Incident on Aug 5, 1999: Employee injured when pinned by machinery
Employee #1 was setting stickers between the layers of lumber on a unit of fir w ood. Employee #1 placed these stickers between each layer of the unit as it was being stacked. When the unit was complete it would be lowered onto a roll-case a nd moved away from the stacker area. Employee #1 went behind the unit as it was being lowered. The roll-case had been left running in reverse, and Employee #1 a nd the stacker operator had forgotten that the rolls were running. The unit of l umber moved and crushed Employee #1 against a metal cross brace on the backside of the unit. Employee #1 received crushing injuries including a punctured lung a nd broken ribs. Employee #1 was hospitalized.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 6357 A
Other-than-serious
$375
$375
Feb 2, 2000
Closed
Inspection 125666842 OPENED SEP 18, 1997Closed
Follow-up · Partial · Safety · 170 employees at the site · Closed Sep 19, 1997
Incident on Aug 16, 1997: Employee's fingertip amputated in alligator chain
Employee #1, a green chain puller at a sawmill, was substituting for the alligat or chain operator, a job he had done five or six times in the past. There was a lull in the boards coming down the chain, and he reached in with his right hand to flip a board that was upstream of his work station. His left hand was resting on the nearest moving strand of the camel back chain. He felt something grab hi s hand and he pulled it away. His little finger had become caught in a pinch or shear point and amputated below the first joint. Employee #1 later stated that h e was looking at the position of his right hand, and did not know what part of t he mechanism amputated his finger. The in-running pinch point of the sprocket wa s guarded, and the camel back links open up on the tip of the chain where he sai d his hand was located. The exact mechanism that caused the injury was not deter mined.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 4050 A
Serious
$750
$750
Sep 8, 1997
Closed
Inspection 120171459 OPENED APR 18, 1996Closed
Complaint · Partial · Safety · 170 employees at the site · Closed Jul 9, 1996
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Eureka site logged 23 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 142 workers: 15.9 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 4.2 for its industry. Those cases cost 38 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Schmidbauer Lumber Co Inc
Eureka · 2025
142
23
9
15.9
4.2
Schmidbauer Lumber Co. Inc.
Eureka · 2016
130
21
8
16.1
4.2
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.