Scott City, Kansas · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · NAICS 311119
OSHA has inspected Scott-Pro 2 times in Kansas since 1975.
The latest one began on Dec 5, 2024 as a planned inspection, in Scott City.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 5 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $95 and still stand at $95.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,874, and Scott-Pro averages $0 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Scott-Pro again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company810 E 1st St, Scott City, KS 67871 · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jan 24, 2025 | Final |
East First Street, Scott City, KS 67871 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.30(a)(4) · Other working surfaces |
Other-than-serious | $30 | $30 | Apr 8, 1975 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.157(d)(3)(iv) · Portable fire extinguishers |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 8, 1975 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.252(e)(4)(v) · Welding fire safety |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 8, 1975 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 | Other-than-serious | $65 | $65 | Apr 8, 1975 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)
(2) The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
29 CFR 1910.157(d)(3)(iv)
(3) The employer may use uniformly spaced standpipe systems or hose stations connected to a sprinkler system installed for emergency use by employees instead of Class A portable fire extinguishers, provided that such systems meet the respective requirements of § 1910.158 or § 1910.159, that they provide total coverage of the area to be protected, and that employees are trained at least annually in their use.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.