Watford City, North Dakota · Security Guards and Patrol Services · NAICS 561612
OSHA has inspected Securitas Security once in North Dakota.
The inspection began on Oct 13, 2017 after a complaint, in Watford City.
That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 2 other-than-serious.
None of the citations carried a penalty.
Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.1200.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for staffing, cleaning and waste services employers since 2015 is $2,201, and Securitas Security averages $0 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Securitas Security again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company109th Avenue Nw Etp Watford City Site, Watford City, ND 58854 · Security Guards and Patrol Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 13, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 13, 2017 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i)
(i) Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.);
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii)
(iii) The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used; and,
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.