OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Segundo Clavijo: OSHA inspections and violations

Palmer, Massachusetts · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
5citation items
$8,960current penalties
Oct 21, 2015last inspection

Since 2012, OSHA inspectors have visited Segundo Clavijo in Massachusetts 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Oct 21, 2015 after a complaint, in Palmer.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious, 1 repeat and 1 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $8,960 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Segundo Clavijo averages $6,160 across 1 cited inspection.

Segundo Clavijo: OSHA citation items per year, 2012 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Massachusetts · latest 90 days of OSHA records

242employers cited

51 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Massachusetts: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Massachusetts

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Segundo Clavijo and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341010791 OPENED OCT 21, 2015Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Nov 7, 2018

Rt 20, Palmer, MA 01069 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$1,760$1,760Jan 21, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$4,400$4,400Jan 21, 2016Final

Inspection 336940408 OPENED OCT 11, 2012Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 8 employees at the site · Closed Jan 18, 2017

1030-1032 Main St, Palmer, MA 01069 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,800$2,800Oct 24, 2012Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction
Serious$0$0Oct 24, 2012Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.252(a) · Disposal of waste materials
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 24, 2012Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4)

(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.

29 CFR 1926.252 · Disposal of waste materials

29 CFR 1926.252(a)

(a) Whenever materials are dropped more than 20 feet to any point lying outside the exterior walls of the building, an enclosed chute of wood, or equivalent material, shall be used. For the purpose of this paragraph, an enclosed chute is a slide, closed in on all sides, through which material is moved from a high place to a lower one.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Massachusetts

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Massachusetts the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.