OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Services by E&E LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Frederick, Maryland · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
5citation items
$2,250current penalties
Nov 12, 2020last inspection

OSHA has inspected Services by E&E LLC once in Maryland.

The inspection began on Nov 12, 2020 after an accident, in Frederick; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $2,250 and still stand at $2,250.

Fall protection training in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.503.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Services by E&E LLC averages $2,250 (1 cited inspection).

Services by E&E LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Services by E&E LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345018428 OPENED NOV 12, 2020Open

Accident · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Open

3801 Shetland Ct., Frederick, MD 21704 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Oct 22, 2020: Helper cleaning debris falls from roof and injures spinal co

At 9:30 a.m. on October 22, 2020, an employee was working as a construction helper for a roofing contractor. His primary language was Spanish. He was Hispanic or Latino. It was not stated where he was born. At his worksite, his coworkers and supervisor spoke Spanish. His firm was working on the alteration or rehabilitation of an existing two-story single-family home. The day of the incident was the first day employees were working onsite. Employees had been installing and removing roofing materials for approximately one and a half hours prior to the incident. The employee was on the roof, clearing debris and installing roofing material as part of his regular job duties. He was working 20 feet (6.1 m) up, over a lower level of compact soil. The roof had a slope of 8:12. The employee was using the attachment point on the front of a body belt as the attachment point for his personal fall arrest system (PFAS). The employee became disconnected from his PFAS and fell. He fell onto compact soil below. He was transported to a major metropolitan hospital's shock trauma unit. The employee had suffered a spinal cord injury. He was hospitalized. The employer did not report the incident within 24 hours. The supervisor was working on site alongside his employees when the incident occurred. The firm's owner had discussed wearing PPE and the need to wear harnesses on a roof with his employees, but he had not conducted any formal or informal training specifically on fall protection.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems
Serious$1,900$1,900Feb 25, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
Serious$0$0Feb 25, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Feb 25, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2) · Reporting deaths and severe injuries
Other-than-serious$350$350Feb 25, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Other-than-serious$0$0Feb 25, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1904.39 · Reporting deaths and severe injuries

29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2)

(2) Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)

(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17)

(17) The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in Maryland

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.