OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

SG Labor, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Buttonwillow, California · Postharvest Crop Activities (except Cotton Ginning) · NAICS 115114

1inspections
2citation items
$9,000current penalties
Dec 4, 2020last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited SG Labor, Inc. in California one time.

It opened on Dec 4, 2020 after an accident, in Buttonwillow.

In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $11,625; today they stand at $9,000, 23% less.

Among farming, fishing and forestry employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $1,440 penalty. SG Labor, Inc. averages $9,000 across 1 cited inspection.

SG Labor, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,128employers cited

4 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch SG Labor, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345142566 OPENED DEC 4, 2020Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 17 employees at the site · Closed Feb 11, 2026

25360 Lerdo Hwy., Buttonwillow, CA 93206 · Postharvest Crop Activities (except Cotton Ginning) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Oct 26, 2020: Employee incurs abrasion and crushing injuries to right hand

At 7:10 a.m. on October 26, 2020, a coworker noticed that a machine, which is used to separate sticks from harvested almonds, had jammed. The coworker signaled to Employee #1 to inform him that the machine was jammed. The coworker took to another task outside of this area, and Employee #1 evaluated the jam. Employee #1 climbed up the side of the machine and saw that there was a piece of debris caught in the belt and that the belt wasn't moving. As Employee #1 proceeded to remove the blockage, the belt began to move again. Employee #1's hand was pulled under the guard and into the in-running nip point where the snubber pulley contacts the belt and the head pulley. There was no evidence to show that lockout/tagout was utilized on the equipment while unjamming the machine. Measurements of the conveyor belt guarding taken by compliance personnel indicated that the clearance between the conveyor belt and the snubber pulley guard was not in compliance. It was also determined that the employer had not conducted at least an annual review of the lockout/tagout procedures as required. Employee #1 suffered major abrasion and crushing injuries to his right hand. Treatment involved emergency room surgery, prescription-strength pain medication, and physical therapy treatment. Employee #1 was hospitalized.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3203(B)(1)
Other-than-serious$375$0Apr 15, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3203(A)
Serious$11,250$9,000Apr 15, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

Other postharvest crop activities (except cotton ginning) employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.