OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Smark Company: OSHA inspections and violations

South Gate, California · Other Warehousing and Storage · NAICS 493190

1inspections
11citation items
$19,200current penalties
Sep 17, 2015last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Smark Company in California one time.

It opened on Sep 17, 2015 after a fatality or catastrophe, in South Gate.

In all, OSHA issued 11 citation items: 3 serious and 8 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $36,950; today they stand at $19,200, 48% less.

Among transportation and warehousing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,555 penalty. Smark Company averages $19,200 across 1 cited inspection.

1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.

Smark Company: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Smark Company again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340928340 OPENED SEP 17, 2015Closed

Fatality or catastrophe · Partial · Safety · 24 employees at the site · Closed Feb 14, 2019

8636 Otis St, South Gate, CA 90280 · Other Warehousing and Storage · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Aug 26, 2015 (fatal): Employee is burned in acetone vapor fire and later dies

At 3:11 p.m. on August 26, 2015, Employee #1, who had worked with the company for three months as a forklift operator/ repacking, was working alone in the repacking area making a transfer of flammable liquid acetone from an elevated 793-gallon stainless steel intermediate bulk container (tote) to a 350-gallon stainless steel tote on the ground. In order to make the transfer, Employee #1 elevated the 793-gallon tote with a Yale forklift. The main valve connected directly to the tote was open, and the valve connected to the transfer hose was closed. While elevating the 793-gallon tote, the valve connected to the transfer hose broke when the two totes came into contact with each other, causing the acetone liquid to spill. Employee #1 tried to close the main valve by going under the elevated tote, but it was too low. The employee went back to the forklift cab and elevated the tote higher. The employee went under the elevated tote the second time, and was able to close the valve. As the leaked acetone vapor travelled, it came in contact with the hot surface of the forklift engine, and caught the forklift and Employee #1 on fire. Employee #1 was able to get out of the burning forklift, but suffered third degree burns over more than 60 percent of his body. He was taken to a local hospital but died a month later as a result of his injuries.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342(A)
Other-than-serious$5,000$1,500Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3203(A)(5)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3668(F)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3382(A)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 3383(B)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 6
29 CFR 3384(A)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 7
29 CFR 5608(A)
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 8
29 CFR 5623
Other-than-serious$450$150Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 5194(H)(2)
Serious$8,100$2,025Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 5611
Serious$8,100$2,025Feb 22, 2016Final
Citation 4, item 1
29 CFR 5622
Serious$12,600$12,600Feb 22, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

Other other warehousing and storage employers in California

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.