Inspection 348923418 OPENED MAY 7, 2026Open
6320 Ridgeland Drive, Bismarck, ND 58504 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
Bismarck, North Dakota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
Since 2022, OSHA inspectors have visited SMY Construction in North Dakota 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on May 7, 2026 after a complaint, in Bismarck and is still open.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 repeat.
The penalties, $14,030 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,078 penalty. SMY Construction averages $7,015 across 2 cited inspections.
Want to know if OSHA cites SMY Construction again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company6320 Ridgeland Drive, Bismarck, ND 58504 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
2384 9z Street Sw, Washburn, ND 58577 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $9,679 | $9,679 | May 29, 2024 | Final |
421 North Griffin Street, Bismarck, ND 58501 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,351 | $4,351 | Oct 27, 2022 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.