OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Solar Solution DC: OSHA inspections and violations

Washington, District of Columbia · Solar Electric Power Generation · NAICS 221114

3inspections
4citation items
$39,895current penalties
Mar 10, 2026last inspection

Solar Solution DC has 3 OSHA inspections on record in District of Columbia, the first in 2018.

OSHA's last visit started on Mar 10, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Washington.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 4 citation items: 2 serious, 1 repeat and 1 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $41,115 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $39,895, down 3%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (3 items).

For context, across all utility employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $0. Solar Solution DC averages $13,298 over 3 cited inspections in that time.

Solar Solution DC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Solar Solution DC: OSHA citation items per year, 2018 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Solar Solution DC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348802240 OPENED MAR 10, 2026Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Sep 11, 2026

1809 Hamlin Street Ne, Washington, DC 20018 · Solar Electric Power Generation · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,220$3,000Jul 7, 2026Final

Inspection 348626813 OPENED DEC 3, 2025Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 20 employees at the site · Closed Sep 25, 2026

2702 17th Street Ne, Washington, DC 20018 · Solar Electric Power Generation · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,220$4,220May 8, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Other-than-serious$4,220$4,220May 8, 2026Final

Inspection 342929817 OPENED JAN 31, 2018Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 11 employees at the site · Closed Jul 16, 2020

2600 Minnesota Ave Se, Washington, DC 20020 · Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$28,455$28,455Apr 13, 2018Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2024, the Washington site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 49 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.8 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Solar Solution DC LLC
Washington · 2024
49 000.01.8

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other solar electric power generation employers in District of Columbia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.