Inspection 349133389 OPENED AUG 25, 2026Open
1 Northampton Street, Easthampton, MA 01027 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
OSHA has inspected SRJ Construction LLC 2 times in Massachusetts since 2025.
The latest one began on Aug 25, 2026 after a complaint, in Easthampton; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 6 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $16,526 and still stand at $16,526.
Fall protection training in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.503.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and SRJ Construction LLC averages $16,526 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites SRJ Construction LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyInspection history
Inspection 348177494 OPENED APR 11, 2025Open
19 Williams St., Williamsburg, MA 01096 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $3,972 | $3,972 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $3,972 | $3,972 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,972 | $3,972 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4a 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $3,972 | $3,972 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4b 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed |
Other-than-serious | $319 | $319 | Jan 20, 2026 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed |
Other-than-serious | $319 | $319 | Jan 20, 2026 | Final |
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1903.19 · Proving cited hazards were fixed
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1)
(c) Abatement certification. (1) Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1)
(d) Abatement documentation. (1) The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.
29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8)
(8) Direct access to or from another surface shall be used only when the scaffold is not more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and not more than 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface.
29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training
29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction
29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction
Other roofing contractors employers in Massachusetts
- JYN Construction, Inc. Medford · 8 citations · $12,121
- Wilde Hse, LLC Amherst · 3 citations · $10,476
- Form-up Foundations LLC Needham · 4 citations · $9,088
- Empire Masonry Corp. Boston · 80 citations · $41,230
- Evolution Roofing Corp Everett · 16 citations · $64,365
- Ner Construction Management, Inc. Boston · 64 citations · $316,230
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.