OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Steven P. Mahrt: OSHA inspections and violations

Petaluma, California · Chicken Egg Production · NAICS 112310

2inspections
5citation items
$3,900current penalties
Jun 9, 2020last inspection

Since 2020, OSHA inspectors have visited Steven P. Mahrt in California 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Jun 9, 2020 as a planned inspection, in Petaluma.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 2 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $12,750; today they stand at $3,900, 69% less.

Among farming, fishing and forestry employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $1,440 penalty. Steven P. Mahrt averages $3,900 across 1 cited inspection.

Steven P. Mahrt: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,128employers cited

2 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Steven P. Mahrt and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344781224 OPENED JUN 9, 2020Closed

Planned · No inspection · Safety · 100 employees at the site · Closed Jun 12, 2020

700 Cavanaugh Lane, Petaluma, CA 94952 · Chicken Egg Production · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344543053 OPENED JAN 7, 2020Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Mar 24, 2021

700 Cavanaugh Lane, Petaluma, CA 94952 · Chicken Egg Production · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Dec 23, 2019: Employee partially amputates finger when reaching into conve

At 2:30 p.m. on December 23, 2019, an employee who works for a poultry egg production operation was working in the processing facility conducting egg packaging. The facility sits on 20 acres with 10 laying houses holding approximately 100,000 chickens and includes the processing facility that prepares and packages approximately 80,000 eggs per day. During the processing, the eggs are passed through multiple stages before they are placed in cartons and packaged for transport. A Number 18038 Selecta Grader machine is utilized for performing multiple egg processing tasks. The machine is equipped with 16 lanes that includes a green belt conveyor driven by a chain and sprocket drive. The sprocket drive is connected by a drive shaft to a belt and pulley drive powered by an electric motor. The employee works directly for the plant manager (Coworker #1) performing plant maintenance and machine repairs and was troubleshooting a problem with the power transmission to conveyor belt on Lane 7. The employee had worked for the employer for approximately 1 year and 2 months. Coworker #1 directly trained and supervised the employee. Coworker #1 was in working in his office repairing a pump at this time. Coworker #2 (processing supervisor) notified the employee that the conveyor belt was not cycling properly, and eggs were getting broken. The employee looked under the conveyor to see if the drive belt on the motor shaft pulley had broken or had come off the pulley, which were common causes of power transmission failure. The employee could see the belt and assumed that it had come off of the pulley. He reached in to pull on the belt when his finger was caught between the belt and the energized drive pulley. The employee had not deenergized the power transmission before reaching into the conveyor. The employee amputated his right index finger to the distal phalanx and was transported to the hospital, where he was admitted.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 3314(G)(2)
Other-than-serious$500$100Jun 23, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3314(J)
Other-than-serious$500$100Jun 23, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3314(L)
Other-than-serious$500$100Jun 23, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3314(C)
Serious$5,625$1,800Jun 23, 2020Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 4002(A)
Serious$5,625$1,800Jun 23, 2020Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

Other chicken egg production employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.