OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Summit View Construction Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Canby, Oregon · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

2inspections
7citation items
$340current penalties
Apr 18, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Summit View Construction Inc 2 times in Oregon since 2013.

The latest one began on Apr 18, 2016 after a complaint, in Portland; the case is still open.

Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 7 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $340 and still stand at $340.

Lead in construction comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.62.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Summit View Construction Inc averages $240 (1 cited inspection).

Summit View Construction Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2013 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Summit View Construction Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341413318 OPENED APR 18, 2016Open

Complaint · Partial · Health · 4 employees at the site · Open

5926 Ne 32nd Pl, Portland, OR 97211 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i) · Lead in construction
 Serious$120$120Jul 28, 2016Open
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(b) · Lead in construction
 Serious$120$120Jul 28, 2016Open
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(c) · Lead in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Open
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(e) · Lead in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Open
Citation 1, item 2d
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(f) · Lead in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2016Open

Inspection 316640366 OPENED JUN 19, 2013Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Nov 8, 2013

1487 N Elm St, Canby, OR 97013 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$100$100Jul 5, 2013Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 5, 2013Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16)

(16) Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, shall either be immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with “Do Not Use” or similar language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.

29 CFR 1926.62 · Lead in construction

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i)

(d) Exposure assessment—(1) General. (i) Each employer who has a workplace or operation covered by this standard shall initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

Other framing contractors employers in Oregon

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.