Davis, California · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · NAICS 236220
Swank Construction Inc has 3 OSHA inspections on record in California, the first in 2007.
OSHA's last visit started on Oct 16, 2018 on a referral, in Vacaville.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 4 citation items: 4 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $1,100 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Swank Construction Inc averages $600 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Swank Construction Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyDrakes Point Radio Tower, Vacaville, CA 95687 · Industrial Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 341(C)(2)(B) |
Other-than-serious | $375 | $375 | Dec 28, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1541(J)(1) |
Other-than-serious | $225 | $225 | Dec 28, 2018 | Final |
101 Margurite St, Williams, CA 95987 · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
635 B Street, Davis, CA 95616 · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1509 A |
Other-than-serious | $250 | $250 | Mar 27, 2007 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1509 C |
Other-than-serious | $250 | $250 | Mar 27, 2007 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.