New Berlin, Wisconsin · Facilities Support Services · NAICS 561210
Swat Environmental has one OSHA inspection on record in Wisconsin.
OSHA opened it on Apr 9, 2024 after a complaint, in New Berlin.
From that inspection OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 other-than-serious.
OSHA did not attach a penalty to any of these citations.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (2 items).
For context, across all staffing, cleaning and waste services employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $2,201. Swat Environmental averages $0 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Swat Environmental also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Wisconsin · latest 90 days of OSHA records
232employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Wisconsin: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Wisconsin
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Swat Environmental and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company16680 West Cleveland Avenue, New Berlin, WI 53151 · Facilities Support Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 4, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 4, 2024 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2024, the New Berlin site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 36 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 0.1 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-West Terrotory & Corprate New Berlin · 2024 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| SWAT Environmental New Berlin · 2023 | 218 | 5 | 4 | 3.5 | 0.1 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii)
(ii) In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Wisconsin the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.