Since 1993, OSHA inspectors have visited Technical Foam Corp. in Colorado 4 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jul 22, 2015 as part of a related case, in Fort Collins.
In all, OSHA issued 9 citation items: 3 serious and 6 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $4,290; today they stand at $3,678, 14% less.
The rule cited most here is 1910.134 (respiratory protection), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Technical Foam Corp. averages $1,428 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Technical Foam Corp. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1000 W. Pitkin St., Fort Collins, CO 80521 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Other-than-serious | $2,040 | $1,428 | Jul 30, 2015 | Final |
1760 Pearl Street, Denver, CO 80203 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1895 W Dartmouth, Englewood, CO 80110 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $750 | $750 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.252(a) · Disposal of waste materials |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.95(a) · Criteria for personal protective equipment |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 3 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 23, 2009 | Closed |
6001 Mcwhinney, Loveland, CO 80538 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.152(a)(1) · Flammable liquids |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Dec 22, 1993 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i)
(i) An employer may provide respirators at the request of employees or permit employees to use their own respirators, if the employer determines that such respirator use will not in itself create a hazard. If the employer determines that any voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer shall provide the respirator users with the information contained in appendix D to this section (“Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard”); and
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii)
(ii) In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii)
(iii) The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.