OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Teo Construction Services, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Perry Hall, Maryland · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$1,050current penalties
Jun 6, 2017last inspection

OSHA has inspected Teo Construction Services, Inc. once in Maryland.

The inspection began on Jun 6, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Perry Hall.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $1,050 and still stand at $1,050.

Fall protection systems comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.502.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Teo Construction Services, Inc. averages $1,050 (1 cited inspection).

Teo Construction Services, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records

195employers cited

38 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Maryland

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Teo Construction Services, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342377231 OPENED JUN 6, 2017Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Nov 28, 2017

9206 Peach Blossom Road, Perry Hall, MD 21128 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$1,050$1,050Jul 28, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$0$0Jul 28, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)

(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17)

(17) The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)

(a) Training program. (1) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.

Other roofing contractors employers in Maryland

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.