OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Texmark Chemical: OSHA inspections and violations

Galena Park, Texas · Petrochemical Manufacturing · NAICS 325110

2inspections
10citation items
$30,233current penalties
Jun 15, 2021last inspection

Since 2019, OSHA inspectors have visited Texmark Chemical in Texas 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Jun 15, 2021 to follow up on an earlier case, in Galena Park.

In all, OSHA issued 10 citation items: 7 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $50,388; today they stand at $30,233, 40% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.119 (process safety management), 10 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,500 penalty. Texmark Chemical averages $30,233 across 1 cited inspection.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

Texmark Chemical: OSHA citation items per year, 2019 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Texmark Chemical again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345364632 OPENED JUN 15, 2021Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Safety · 46 employees at the site · Closed Jun 16, 2021

900 Clinton Drive, Galena Park, TX 77547 · Petrochemical Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344066386 OPENED JUN 10, 2019Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 46 employees at the site · Closed Jun 22, 2021

900 Clinton Drive, Galena Park, TX 77547 · Petrochemical Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(b) · Process safety management
Serious$9,282$5,570Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i) · Process safety management
Serious$9,282$5,570Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii) · Process safety management
Serious$9,282$5,570Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vi) · Process safety management
Serious$0$0Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2) · Process safety management
Serious$5,304$3,183Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i) · Process safety management
Serious$9,282$5,570Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 6
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iii) · Process safety management
Serious$7,956$4,770Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii) · Process safety management
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(a) · Process safety management
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 6, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3) · Process safety management
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 6, 2019Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Jul 15, 2015, Galena Park: Hospitalization · fractures · hand(s), unspecified

The employee was using a hand drill at the shop drilling holes on a 2 inch piece of pipe. The electric drill bound up or jerked while he was holding it. The employee fractured his right hand.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.119 · Process safety management

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(b)

(B) Piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID's);

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i)

(i) The hazards of the process;

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii)

(iii) Engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. (Acceptable detection methods might include process monitoring and control instrumentation with alarms, and detection hardware such as hydrocarbon sensors.);

Other petrochemical manufacturing employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.