OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Third Coast Packaging: OSHA inspections and violations

Pearland, Texas · Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing · NAICS 325180

1inspections
6citation items
$24,300current penalties
Jun 9, 2015last inspection

Third Coast Packaging has one OSHA inspection on record in Texas.

OSHA opened it on Jun 9, 2015 after a complaint, in Pearland.

From that inspection OSHA issued 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $32,400 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $24,300, down 25%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.119, process safety management (6 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,500. Third Coast Packaging averages $24,300 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Third Coast Packaging also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Third Coast Packaging: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Third Coast Packaging again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340690171 OPENED JUN 9, 2015Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 200 employees at the site · Closed Jun 29, 2017

1871 Mykawa Road, Pearland, TX 77581 · Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1) · Process safety management
Serious$6,300$3,300Dec 2, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(4) · Process safety management
Serious$6,300$4,500Dec 2, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1910.119(i)(2)(ii) · Process safety management
Serious$6,300$5,700Dec 2, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5) · Process safety management
Serious$6,300$4,500Dec 2, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 6
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(6)(i) · Process safety management
Serious$6,300$6,300Dec 2, 2015Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(b) · Process safety management
Other-than-serious$900$0Dec 2, 2015Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2016, the Pearland site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 178 workers: 0.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.6 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Third Coast Packaging
Pearland · 2016
178 100.52.6

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.119 · Process safety management

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(b)

(B) Piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID's);

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1)

(e) Process hazard analysis. (1) The employer shall perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by this standard. The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process. Employers shall determine and document the priority order for conducting process hazard analyses based on a rationale which includes such considerations as extent of the process hazards, number of potentially affected employees, age of the process, and operating history of the process. The process hazard analysis shall be conducted as soon as possible, but not later than the following schedule:

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(4)

(4) The process hazard analysis shall be performed by a team with expertise in engineering and process operations, and the team shall include at least one employee who has experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated. Also, one member of the team must be knowledgeable in the specific process hazard analysis methodology being used.

Other other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.