Clark, New Jersey · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
Since 2003, OSHA inspectors have visited Tiger Construction LLC in New Jersey 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Aug 9, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Edison.
In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 6 serious.
The penalties, $15,076 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Tiger Construction LLC averages $9,976 across 1 cited inspection.
New Jersey · latest 90 days of OSHA records
270employers cited
36 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in New Jersey: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in New Jersey
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Tiger Construction LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company250 Grandview Avenue, Edison, NJ 08837 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,988 | $4,988 | Oct 26, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $4,988 | $4,988 | Oct 26, 2016 | Final |
525 Central Ave, Clark, NJ 07066 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) · Construction safety training |
Serious | $600 | $600 | Aug 11, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Aug 11, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1) · Stairways in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Aug 11, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Aug 11, 2003 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)
(1) Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, shall be equipped with:
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16)
(16) Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, shall either be immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with “Do Not Use” or similar language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in New Jersey the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.