Inspection 348533449 OPENED SEP 24, 2025Open
312 Industrial Ave Ne, Albuquerque, NM 87107 · Tile and Terrazzo Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
Since 2010, OSHA inspectors have visited Tile Mart in New Mexico 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Sep 24, 2025 to follow up on an earlier case, in Albuquerque and is still open.
In all, OSHA issued 13 citation items: 12 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $21,513; today they stand at $14,851, 31% less.
The rule cited most here is 1910.1053 (silica dust in general industry), 7 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Tile Mart averages $14,851 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Tile Mart again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyInspection history
Inspection 347430787 OPENED APR 22, 2024Open
312 Industrial Ave, Albuquerque, NM 87107 · Tile and Terrazzo Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $4,821 | $3,375 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.134(k) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1d 29 CFR 1910.1053(g)(2) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.1053(c) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $4,821 | $3,375 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $4,821 | $3,375 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1910.1053(h)(1) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $3,375 | $2,363 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5a 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $3,375 | $2,363 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5b 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5c 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5d 29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1) · Silica dust in general industry |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i) · Silica dust in general industry |
Other-than-serious | $300 | $0 | Oct 18, 2024 | Final |
Inspection 314489923 OPENED MAY 13, 2010Closed
3501 Pan American Freeway, Albuquerque, NM 87505 · Other Building Material Dealers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1053 · Silica dust in general industry
29 CFR 1910.1053(c)
(c) Permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 µg/m 3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA.
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1)
(d) Exposure assessment—(1) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1)
(f) Methods of compliance—(1) Engineering and work practice controls. The employer shall use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section.
29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication
29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection
Other tile and terrazzo contractors employers in New Mexico
- F-Core, Lath, Plaster, & Construction, Inc. Albuquerque · 4 citations · $7,102
- Amestoy Dri-Wall, Inc. Albuquerque · 13 citations · $59,794
- B & B Plastering Systems, LLC Albuquerque · 2 citations · $9,932
- J & H Homes, Inc. Roswell · 1 citation · $3,214
- Banker Insulation, Inc. Santa Fe · 1 citation · $4,635
- Rodriguez Plastering, Inc. Las Cruces · 21 citations · $14,482
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.