OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Tornado Drywall LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Rosemount, Minnesota · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · NAICS 238310

2inspections
4citation items
$908current penalties
Sep 15, 2021last inspection

Since 2021, OSHA inspectors have visited Tornado Drywall LLC in Minnesota 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Sep 15, 2021 as a planned inspection, in Rosemount.

In all, OSHA issued 4 citation items: 3 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $975; today they stand at $908, 7% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.1200 (hazard communication), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Tornado Drywall LLC averages $454 across 2 cited inspections.

Tornado Drywall LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2021 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

381employers cited

2 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Minnesota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Tornado Drywall LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345543805 OPENED SEP 15, 2021Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Dec 27, 2021

14589 Robert Trail S, Rosemount, MN 55068 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1) · Stairways in construction
Serious$225$158Dec 7, 2021Final

Inspection 345359343 OPENED MAY 25, 2021Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Sep 27, 2021

14589 Robert Trail S, Rosemount, MN 55068 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$250$250Aug 3, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$500$500Aug 3, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 3, 2021Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)

(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.

29 CFR 1926.1052 · Stairways in construction

29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)

(1) Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, shall be equipped with:

Other drywall and insulation contractors employers in Minnesota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.