OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

USA Rollers, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Loveland, Ohio · Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing · NAICS 333922

1inspections
2citation items
$5,461current penalties
Dec 8, 2020last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited USA Rollers, Inc. in Ohio one time.

It opened on Dec 8, 2020 on a referral, in Loveland.

In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $5,461 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. USA Rollers, Inc. averages $5,461 across 1 cited inspection.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

USA Rollers, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites USA Rollers, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345051197 OPENED DEC 8, 2020Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Mar 24, 2021

154 Commerce Blvd, Loveland, OH 45140 · Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Dec 3, 2020: Employee amputates finger when caught in swaging machine

At 9:30 a.m. on December 3, 2020, an employee was working for a firm that manufactured conveyors and conveying equipment. She was a temporary assembly worker. The narrative did not say whether she had come from a temporary staffing agency or had been reassigned from duty elsewhere in the firm. There was no second UPA. The employee was operating a two-hand control swager or swaging machine. It was a kind of hydraulic press. The employee would place a plastic conveyor connector inside the metal tube. The machine would then crimp the metal on either end of the tube to keep the plastic connector in place. The time, the tube was pulled out of alignment. When the employee put the tube back into the proper alignment within the tube clamp, her right middle finger was caught inside the clamp and amputated. The employee was hospitalized. It was known that the two-hand control device had never functioned properly. Three other employees who all used the swager machine said during their interviews that when they removed their hands from the two-hand control device, the swager would continue to operate. Two of these employees explained that there wasn't any other guarding, and that the two-hand control device never stopped the swager from operating, even when they removed their hands from the two-hand control device. The firm's chief financial officer said in an email that the firm had begun using the swager in October 2020. The vice president of operations said during his interview that he had worked on the swagger when it first arrived. When he used the machine, it would continue to cycle, even when he removed his hands from the control device. He added that there were no other guards. During the walkaround, the CSHO was led to believe by the warehouse manager that the control device had initially worked, but that it had malfunctioned. The employer had put the machine into service knowing that it was not functioning correctly. The employer explained that this was a new company.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$5,461$5,461Feb 26, 2021Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$0$0Feb 26, 2021Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Dec 3, 2020, Loveland: Hospitalization, amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)

An employee was operating a swaging machine and amputated a fingertip.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)

(2) The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

Other conveyor and conveying equipment manufacturing employers in Ohio

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.