OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Valero Refinery: OSHA inspections and violations

Wilmington, California · Petroleum Refineries · NAICS 324110

7inspections
3citation items
$20,750current penalties
Jan 25, 2021last inspection

OSHA has inspected Valero Refinery 7 times in California since 2003.

The latest one began on Jan 25, 2021 after a fatality or catastrophe, in Wilmington.

Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $39,370 and now stand at $20,750, 47% lower after settlements or reviews.

comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 2320.2.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,500, and Valero Refinery averages $20,000 (1 cited inspection).

1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.

Valero Refinery: OSHA citation items per year, 2003 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Valero Refinery again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345113823 OPENED JAN 25, 2021Closed

Fatality or catastrophe · Partial · Health · 400 employees at the site · Closed Jun 22, 2021

2402 East Anaheim St., Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Feb 17, 2021 (fatal): Twelve employees are positive for covid-19 infection, one di

On February 17, 2021, an employee who worked as an Operating Engineer for a petroleum refinery died from COVID-19. The refinery had experienced an outbreak in the Utilities Work Station section. Eleven of the employee's coworkers, 10 Operating Engineers and 1 Production Supervisor, also tested positive for COVID-19. None of the other employees were hospitalized at the time the narrative was written. Information regarding engineering, administrative and personal protective equipment controls for COVID-19 are not included in the narrative.

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344925961 OPENED SEP 15, 2020Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 10,015 employees at the site · Closed Dec 18, 2020

2402 East Anaheim St., Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344606678 OPENED FEB 4, 2020Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 399 employees at the site · Closed Jul 13, 2020

961 S. La Paloma, Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 342092475 OPENED FEB 7, 2017Closed

Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · 50 employees at the site · Closed Jun 18, 2018

1651 Alameda St, Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Other-than-serious$8,435$10,000Jun 12, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1 Other-than-serious$8,435$10,000Jun 12, 2017Final

Inspection 313648685 OPENED JUL 18, 2013Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 500 employees at the site · Closed Feb 11, 2014

2402 E Anaheim, Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jul 17, 2013: Employee suffer burns when splashed with hot condensate

At approximately 8:00 a.m. on July 17, 2013, Employee #1 was assigned to drop th e bottom head on coke drum B for maintenance on the head alignment pins. Drum B had previously been cleaned and emptied and the head was reinstalled. It was dur ing that process that the flaw in the alignment pins was discovered. When Employ ee #1 and a coworker began the job, they noticed electricians working in the are a of the coke pit, where the coke drums would drain. The drum was empty, but Emp loyee #1 and the coworker were aware that there would be hot condensate in the d rum. Employee #1 and the coworkers, not wanting to disrupt the electricians, dec ided to drain drum #B by using an unwritten procedure only used when the drain l ines were plugged. This process would allow the hot condensate to drain on the d eck and not interfere with the electricians. Employee #1 began lowering the head on the bottom of drum #B using the hydraulic ram. The controller for the ram wo uld usually be on a 25 ft leash allowing the operator to be out of the danger zo ne. Employee #1 was operating the controller from directly under drum #B. The hy draulic ram moved slowly, placing a cheater bar on the control lever. The cowork er turned and walked away just as the hot condensate gushed out of the drum/head opening drenching Employee #1. The employee received 1st and 2nd degree burns t o his upper and lower back. Employee #1 was taken to an area hospital, where he was treated and remained hospitalized.

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 313644106 OPENED OCT 25, 2011Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 425 employees at the site · Closed Jan 20, 2012

2102 Anaheim Bl, Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 305472052 OPENED JAN 15, 2003Closed

Accident · Complete · Safety · 425 employees at the site · Closed Nov 24, 2003

2402 E Alahambra, Wilmington, CA 90744 · Petroleum Refineries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Dec 8, 2002: Employee gets burns when hot condensate gushes out

At 3:30 p.m. on December 8, 2002, an accident took place in Unit 44, the heavy o ils light ends recovery system, in a large oil refinery in Wilmington, Delaware. This unit used process of absorption and distillation to recover butane and pro pane from the sour overhead gas streams in the cooker unit and the vapor recover y unit. The accident took place at the bottom of 44-V-4004, a debutanizer that s eparated the butane and then the propane from the naphtha for further processing . 44-V-4004 was out of service and being steam cleaned for about 24 hours. Emplo yee #1, a chief operator, and a coworker went out to the approximately 120-ft-hi gh by 8-ft-round vessel to discuss the next phase of the cleaning process. Emplo yee #1 and the coworker blocked in a 2-in. valve venting steam to the Process De pressuring System (PDS) and broke the flange below a 4-in. valve, installing spr eader bars between the flanges. This piping configuration was approximately 6 ft above the deck. The steam to the tower was restarted and the valve above the sp reader bar flange was opened, steaming the vessel to the deck. At 3:30 p.m., Emp loyee #1 and the coworker went to the vessel and removed the steam and water. Em ployee #1 went to the spreader bar flange to verify that 44-V-4004 was empty. Em ployee #1 picked up a piece of a wire, Number 9, and probed between the spreader bar and the flange to dislodge any scale. As Employee #1 turned, a hot condensa te gushed out of the spread flange, knocking him to the ground. Employee #1 sust ained second-degree burns to the back, arms, and legs and was hospitalized.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 6828 A
Other-than-serious$22,500$750Sep 29, 2003Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 2320.2

Other petroleum refineries employers in California

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.